![]() 01/05/2017 at 16:19 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
is this $900 British headache worth?
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 01/05/2017 at 16:22 |
|
something tells me that the “few repairs” is more like Ray Stantz in Ghostbusters.
“ Everybody can relax, I found the car. Needs some suspension work and shocks. Brakes, brake pads, lining, steering box, transmission, rear-end.
Also new rings, mufflers, a little wiring.”
![]() 01/05/2017 at 16:24 |
|
4 Shitty pictures: check
Poor punctuation/English: check
“Minor fixes”: check
![]() 01/05/2017 at 16:25 |
|
That’s one of those purchases where you look at it and then your wallet and say “,Eh, fuck it.” Then think “, How bad can it be?” It’s technically cheap.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 16:30 |
|
know what I have, no lowballers
![]() 01/05/2017 at 16:46 |
|
Hides the fact it needs at the very least a new water pump.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 17:09 |
|
Disco I, so could be way worse/more spendy to keep on the road (cough, Disco II, cough). 95 might be a one-year only transmission and might be a last-year 3.9 with Lucas injection. Not *bad* per se, but might make keeping parts straight... interesting. Early Disco Is are also not the best electrically: expect demons.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 17:15 |
|
I mean, the Disco 2 generally isn’t too bad as long as you stay on top of head gaskets and timing chain. But one that looking that neglected could of course be holding surprises...
![]() 01/05/2017 at 17:16 |
|
Is there a Disco (i or ii) that was good electrically? I didn’t think there was. D2 I had actually poured electrical smoke out the AC vents once. It was neat
![]() 01/05/2017 at 17:17 |
|
that’s a d1 though, an early one at that!
![]() 01/05/2017 at 17:18 |
|
I have been told that ‘98 Disco Is are comparatively Not On Fire. I think Disco Is mostly just Don’t Work, Damnit.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 17:30 |
|
do it!
just have plenty of aspirin handy.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 18:09 |
|
Nice Price at $200... since I figure selling it for scrap metal might net $250.